PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, KOMITE AUDIT, DAN DERIVATIF KEUANGAN TERHADAP EFFECTIVE TAX RATE

Main Article Content

Abstract

Tax for the company gives significant attention. Tax is seen as a burden that can reduce profit so the company will strive any efforts to pay tax at a lower cost. Meanwhile, the government considers tax as an important state income so that the government will draw tax as high as possible. To determine company effectiveness in managing tax, need a calculation. Measurement of effective tax planning can be done using the Effective Tax Rate. The differences ETR between companies can cause by several different factors. Therefore, this study aims to investigate several factors that influence ETR. The samples are manufacturing companies listed on the IDX period 2015-2017. The sampling technique is non-probability sampling using a purposive sampling method. This research used SPSS 20 with a quantitative analysis technique. The author uses the outlier method to improve data. There are 17 passed companies. The results of the F test indicate the independent variables simultaneously affected the dependent variable with a value of 0,000. The research showed the audit committee has a significant effect on ETR. Meanwhile, managerial ownership and financial derivative do not have a significant effect on ETR.

 

Keywords: Effective Tax Rate, Managerial Ownership, Audit Committee, Financial Derivative

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, KOMITE AUDIT, DAN DERIVATIF KEUANGAN TERHADAP EFFECTIVE TAX RATE. (2020). Jurnal Akuntansi, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v8i2.620
Section
Articles

References

Ardyansah, D., & Zulaikha. (2014). Pengaruh Size, Leverage, Profitability, Capital Intensity Ratio Dan Komisaris Independen Terhadap Effective Tax Rate (ETR). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(2), 1–9.

Bursa Efek Indonesia. Derivatif, diakses 9 November 2018,

https://www.idx.co.id/produk/derivatif

Cooper, D. R., & Pamela S, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Damayanti, F., & Susanto, T. (2015). Pengaruh Komite Audit, Kualitas Audit, Kepemilikan Institusional, Risiko Perusahaan Dan Return on Assets Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Esensi, 5(2), 187–206.

FCGI. (2001). Seri Tata Kelola Perusahaan (Corporate Governance) (2nd ed.). Jakarta.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete (8th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hanum, H. R., & Zulaikha. (2013). Pengaruh Karakteristik Corporate Governance Terhadap Effective Tax Rate. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2(2), 1–10.

Hartadinata, O. S., & Tjaraka, H. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kebijakan Hutang, Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Tax Aggressiveness Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode Tahun 2008-2010. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, (3), 48–59.

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Lestari, M. K., Rifa, D., & Rahmawati, N. (2014). Pengaruh Size, Leverage, Profitability, Dan Capital Intensity Ratio Terhadap Effective Tax Rate. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bung Hatta, 1–15.

Mayangsari, S. (2003). Analisis Pengaruh Independensi, Kualitas Audit, Serta Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Integritas Laporan Keuangan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VI, Surabaya, 1255–1273.

Meilinda, M., & Cahyonowati, N. (2013). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Manajemen Pajak. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi-Manajemen-Akuntansi, 2(3), 1–13.

Musyarofah, E. (2016). Skripsi: Pengaruh Derivatif Keuangan, Leverage dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (Tax Aviodance). Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah. Jakarta.

Noor, R. M., Fadzillah, N. S. M., & Mastuki, N. (2010). Corporate Tax Planning: A Study On Corporate Effective Tax Rates of Malaysian Listed Companies. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 1(2), 189–193.

Nuswandari, C. (2009). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Perception Index Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 16(2), 70–84.

OECD. (1998). Corporate Governance Improving Competitiveness and Access to Capital in Global Market, diakses 13 Oktober 2018, https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/corporate-governance-improving-competitiveness-and-access-to-capital-in-global-markets_9789264162709-en#page1

Oktavia, & Martani, D. (2013). Tingkat Pengungkapan dan Penggunaan Derivatif Keuangan Dalam Aktivitas Penghindaran Pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 10(2), 129–146.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 55/POJK.04/2015 Tentang Pembentukan Dan Pelaksanaan Kerja Komite Audit.

Putri, C. L., & Lautania, M. F. (2016). Pengaruh Capital Intensity Ratio, Inventory Intensity Ratio, Ownership Structure Dan Profitability terhadap Effective Tax Rate. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 1(1), 101–119.

Putri, K. (2017). Pengaruh Corporate Governance, Ukuran Perusahaan, Rasio Hutang Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Tarif Pajak Efektif. Faculty of Economy Riau University, 4(1), 1501–1515.

Septriadi, D., & Darussalam. (2009). Rugi Derivatif Untuk Tujuan Spekulatif: Deductible or Not, diakses 13 Oktober 2018, https://www.ortax.org/ortax/?mod=issue&page=show&id=39&list=&q=&hlm=6

Sista, G. R., & Ardityanto, M. D. (2017). Pengaruh Tata Kelola Perusahaan Dan Penggunaan Derivatif Keuangan Terhadap Effective Tax Rate (ETR) Perusahaan. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 6(1), 1–11.

Suparman, R. A. (2014). Mengenal Penghindaran Pajak (Tax Avoidance), diakses 13 Oktober 2018, http://pajaktaxes.blogspot.com/2014/08/mengenal-penghindaran-pajak-tax.html

Suranta, S., & Sudaryono, E. A. (2016). Manajemen Laba Dan Perubahan Tarif Pph Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2008. Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(1), 22–30.

Sutedi, A. (2011). Good Corporate Governance. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Wulansari, R. (2015). Pengaruh Karakteristik Corporate Governance Terhadap Effective Tax Rate (ETR). Faculty of Economy Riau University, 2(2), 1–15.