Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): May - October
Articles

Digital Marketing Strategies among Traditional Healers in Solo and Wonosobo: Engaging Young Audiences

Yohanes Langgar Billy
Universitas Multimedia Nusantara
Bio
Indiwan Seto Wahjuwibowo
Universitas Multimedia Nusantara
Bio
Kanon Mommsen Wongkar
Universitas Multimedia Nusantara
Bio

Published 2025-07-03

Keywords

  • traditional healers,
  • digital marketing,
  • youth engagement,
  • social media,
  • uses and gratifications theory,
  • Solo,
  • Wonosobo
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Billy, Y. L., Wahjuwibowo, I. S., & Wongkar, K. M. (2025). Digital Marketing Strategies among Traditional Healers in Solo and Wonosobo: Engaging Young Audiences. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Bisnis, 13(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.46806/jkb.v13i1.1393

Abstract

Traditional healers in Solo and Wonosobo face increasing challenges in engaging young people, despite the widespread use of digital platforms by this demographic. This study explores the adoption of digital marketing strategies by traditional healers to enhance their outreach to youth. Employing a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with healers in both regions to examine their current practices and perceptions regarding digital engagement. The findings reveal that while a few healers, such as Ibu Ani, have effectively utilized platforms like TikTok and Instagram, most still rely heavily on word-of-mouth promotion. Limited use of digital media stems from a lack of technological skills and insufficient content tailored to youth preferences. The study is guided by Uses and Gratifications Theory to understand how young people seek and interact with online health content. The results suggest that to improve engagement, traditional healers should adopt more interactive and youth-oriented digital strategies, including collaboration with influencers and the use of culturally resonant content. These findings offer practical insights for revitalizing traditional medicine in the digital age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ahmad K, Ahmad M, Huber FK, Weckerle CS. (2021) Traditional medicinal knowledge and practices among the tribal communities of Thakht-e-Sulaiman Hills, Pakistan. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Sep 13;21(1):230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03403-1.
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  3. Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2019). Digital Marketing: Strategy, Implementation, and Practice (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
  4. Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006). Qualitative Research Guidelines Project. Princeton University. Retrieved from https://www.qualres.org
  5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  6. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
  7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  8. Farnsworth, N. R., et al. (1985). The Value of Medicinal Plants in Healthcare. Pharmaceutical Journal, 235(1), 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109s169
  9. Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
  10. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031.
  11. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973-1974). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
  12. Labhardt ND, Aboa SM, Manga E, Bensing JM, Langewitz W. (2010). Bridging the gap: how traditional healers interact with their patients. A comparative study in Cameroon. Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Sep;15(9):1099-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02575.x.
  13. Martati, Baruli., Firmannandya, Ade., Kartika, Pheni Cahya., Mukarrohman. (2024). Digitizing Traditional Health in Indonesia Unlocks Community Potential. Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development, 16(1). (2025). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijccd.v15i2.986
  14. McCrindle, M & Wolfinger, E. (2009). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the Global Generations. McCrindle Research.
  15. McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
  16. Orsolini, L., Appignanesi, C., Pompili, S., & Volpe, U. (2022). The role of digital tools in providing youth mental health: results from an international multi-center study. International Review of Psychiatry, 34(7–8), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2022.2118521
  17. Pew Research Center. (2021). The Digital Divide and Young People: Trends in Technology Adoption. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org
  18. Ryan, D. (2016). Understanding Digital Marketing: Marketing Strategies for Engaging the Digital Generation (4th ed.). Kogan Page Publishers.
  19. Saldana, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  20. Schneider, R.H. & Seetharaman, M. (2022). The Future of Medicine: Frontiers in Integrative Health and Medicine. Medicina. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-0365-3203-5
  21. Srisa‐ard, S. (2007), "Digital Generations: Children, Young People and New Media", Online Information Review, 31(5). 706-707. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520710832379
  22. Stoumpos Angelos., Kitsios Fotis., Talias, M.A. (2023). Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health. 20 (4):3407. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043407.
  23. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x