Jurnal Komunikasi dan Bisnis

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): November
Articles

OMNIBUS LAW CIPTA KERJA IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE AND PUBLIC OPINION

PDF
  • Didin Sabarudin
Didin Sabarudin
Universitas Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46806/jkb.v10i2.901

Published 2022-11-30

Keywords

  • regulation,
  • multi-sector,
  • participation,
  • public-opinion

How to Cite

Sabarudin, D. (2022). OMNIBUS LAW CIPTA KERJA IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE AND PUBLIC OPINION. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Bisnis, 10(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.46806/jkb.v10i2.901

Abstract

The government decided that the omnibus law technique was a new legal breakthrough as an option to accomodate various overlapping multi-sector regulations. Law 11 of 2020 is projected to accelerate economic growth and increase the nation’s competitiveness by opening up the widest possible space for facilitating the business and investment climate to face the competition in the digital ecosystem of the world economy and global governance. This regulation raises debate in the public sphere, because this is suspected that the political process that occured during the legislative stages was formally flawed without the involvement of public participation. The dilemma between the policy agenda and the public agenda then continous through the communication media. This study aims to reveal the phenomenon of public opinion about the omni bus law of job creation and public participation in determining public affairs with multi-sectoral dimensions. Public opinion in the public sphere shows of the process of political communication that occurs as well as interaction between the policy agenda and the public agenda. The theoritical paradigm of phenomenology and research is critical in constructing an analytical descriptive approach with qualitative methods used to determine the relationship between the policy agenda, media agenda, and public agenda with various influencing factors.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Annas, Faris Budiman, Hasya Nailan Petranto, Asep Aji Pramayoga (2019), Opini Publik Dalam Polarisasi Politik di Media Sosial, JURNAL PIKOM, Vol. 20 No. 2 Desember, hlm. 111-122.
  2. Bayir, Aidan dan Tim Lomas (2016), Difficulties Generating Self-compassion: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, Vol. 4 No.1. pp.15-33.
  3. Brown, Laurie B (1973), Ideology, Baltimore: Penguin Education.
  4. Busroh, Firman Freaddy (2017), Konseptualisasi Omnibus Law dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Regulasi Pertanahan, Jurnal Arena Hukum, Vol. 10 No. 2.
  5. Chomsky, Noam (2009), Politik Kuasa Media, (Terjemahan), Yogyakarta: Pinus Book. Cet.3.
  6. Fishkin, James S (2009), When the People Speak, London: Oxford University Press.
  7. Garner, Bryan A et.al. (2009), Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th Edition (eds), St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
  8. Murdock, Graham & Peter Golding (1979), Capitalism, Communication and Class Relation, dalam James Curran, Michael Gurevitch and ]anet Woollacott (ed), Mass Communication and Society. Baverly Hills: Sage Publication, hal. 12-42.
  9. Habermas, Jurgen (2006), Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? Communication Theory.
  10. Heryanto, Gun Gun (2020), Realitas Komunikasi Politik Indonesia Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
  11. Heywood, Andrew (2012), Political Ideologies: An Introduction, 5th Edition, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  12. Imran, Hasyim Ali (2013), Fenomena Komunikasi dan Ilmu Komunikasi: Telaah Filsafat Ilmu Berbasis Elemen Epistemologi, Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media, Vol. 17, No. 2, hal: 197-217.
  13. Indrawan, Raden Mas Jerry (2017), Dampak Komunikasi Politik dan Opini Publik Terhadap Perilaku Masyarakat, Wacana, Vol 16, No.2, Desember, hlm. 171 – 179.
  14. Irvan, Rizal (2020), Omnibus Law Antara Desiderata Dan Realita, Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, Volume 15 Nomor 2. Juli-Desember 2020, hal. 192.
  15. Kellner, Douglas (2013), Theorizing Globalization, Jurnal Sociological Theory, Vol. 20, No.3.
  16. Keyzer, Patrick, The Indonesian Omnibus law: Opportunities and Challenges. Kuliah Umum, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 29 January 2020.
  17. Kollipost, Julia Tiemann (2020), Political Participation in the Digital Age, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
  18. Lane, Max (2014), Decentralization and It Discontents: An Essay on Class, Political Agency and National Perspective in Indonesian Politics, Singapore: ISEAS.
  19. Mihradi, R. Muhammad (2019), Omnibus Law: Menuju Hukum Ramah Investasi?, Diakses 19 Desember 2021 dari https://unpak.ac.id/pdf/ 2019/mihradi_omnibus.pdf.
  20. Murdiyanto, Eko (2020), Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Teori dan Aplikasi disertai Contoh Proposal, Yogyakarta: LP2M UPN Veteran Yogyakarta Press.
  21. Muslim (2016), Varian-varian Paradigma, Pemdekatan, Metode, dan Jenis Penelitian Dalam Ilmu Komunikasi, Wahana, Vol. 1, No. 10. Tahun Akademik 2015/2016.
  22. Nainggolan, Bastian (2017), Gerak Kapital Industri Media Nasional, Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Volume 15, Nomor 2, Mei-Agustus, hal: 165-176.
  23. Norris, Pippa (2011), Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Patten, Mildred L. and Michelle Newhart (2018), Understanding Research Methods. An Overview an Essentials, 10th Edition, New York: Routledge-Taylor & Francis.
  25. Petz, G. K (2015), Computational approaches for mining user’s opinions on the web 2.0. Information Processing and Management, 51(4), 510–519.
  26. Syahputra, Iswandi (2019), Opini Publik: Konsep, Pembentukan, Pengukuran, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, Cet ke-2.
  27. Solihin, Olih dan Anur Janah (2021), Wacana Kapitalisme Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja, Komunika: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Vol 08(01):61-68.
  28. Slater, Dan (2013), Democratic Careening, Dalam World Politic, Vol. 65, Nomor 4.
  29. Tim Peneliti Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia (2019), Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi Indonesia: Prosiding Forum Akademik Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi, Jakarta: Yayasan Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia
  30. Törnquist, Olle (2013), Assessing Dinamycs of Democratisation: Transformative Politics, New Institutions, and the Case of Indonesia, New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
  31. University of California-Los Angeles (2008), The Annual Review of Political Science, http://polisci.annualreviews.org, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11. 060406.214132.
  32. Weber, Max (2021), The Three Pure Types of Legitimate Domination, In Magalhaes, Pedro T, The legitimacy of Modern Democracy (pp. 46), New York: Routledge-Taylor & Francis.
  33. Yudhatama, Iranda (2017), Komunikasi Politik dan Partisipasi Warga Dalam Arena Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Dana Keistimewaan DIY, Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Volume 15, Nomor 3, September - Desember, hal: 205-214.
  34. Zubi, Muhammad, Marzuki, dan Ibnu Affan (2021), Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hak-Hak Normatif Tenaga Kerja Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Omnibus Law), Jurnal Ilmiah Metadata, Vol. 3 No. 3, September 2021, hal. 1171-1195.