Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Reporting di Lingkungan BUMN: Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory

Main Article Content

Veronica Fransisca
Sugi Suhartono

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of variables such as financial stability, financial targets, external pressure, ineffective monitoring, audit fees, change in director, change in auditor, total accruals, and CEO duality on the risk of fraudulent financial reporting in state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The study is grounded in agency theory, stakeholder theory, and the GONE theory. The research sample consists of 19 SOEs listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2017-2022, with a total of 114 observations. The sampling method used purposive sampling technique, and data analysis was conducted using logistic regression method with SPSS software version 27. The research findings that financial stability and financial targets have a significant positive impact on fraudulent financial reporting, while other variables do not have a significant influence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fransisca, V., & Suhartono, S. (2025). Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Reporting di Lingkungan BUMN: Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v14i1.1254
Section
Articles

References

ACFE. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report To The Nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 1–96.

Anisykurlillah, I., Ardiansah, M. N., & Nurrahmasari, A. (2023). Fraudulent Financial Statements Detection Using Fraud Triangle Analysis: Institutional Ownership as A Moderating Variable. Accounting Analysis Journal, 11(2), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v11i2.57517

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia. (2019). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. Indonesia Chapter #111, 53(9), 1–76. https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/survei-fraud-indonesia/

Aviantara, R. (2021). The Association Between Fraud Hexagon and Government’s Fraudulent Financial Report. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 6(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v6i1.192

Bologna, J., Lindquist, R. J., & Wells, J. T. (1993). The Accountant’s Handbook of Fraud and Commercial Crime: Wiley New York, NY. Wiley New York.

Buallay, A. (2020). Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance: Comparative study between manufacturing and banking sectors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money. A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 45(4), 464. https://doi.org/10.2307/1140029

Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : Agency Theory : An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management, 14(1), 57–74.

Gando Suri, A. (2023). Analisis Fraud Hexagon Dalam Mendeteksi Potensi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN). Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(5), 3495–3515. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i5.11885

Hardirmaningrum, A., & Abdul Rohman. (2023). Determinasi Teori Fraud Hexagon dan Karakteristik Komite Audit dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 6(4), 490–509. https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v6i4.28180

Hartadi, B. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statements pada Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Indonesia yang Terdaftar di Bei pada Tahun 2018-2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 14883–14896. https://mail.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/4766/4039

Howard, C. (2011). Putting the Freud in Fraud: Why the Fraud Triangle Is No Longer Enough. https://www.crowe.com/global

https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190430174733-92-390927/kronologi-kisruh laporan-keuangan-garuda-indonesia

Diakses pada 20 Oktober 2023.

https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20200108111414-78-463406/kronologi-kasus-jiwasraya-gagal-bayar-hingga-dugaan-korupsi

Diakses 24 Oktober 2023.

http://www.kbr68h.com/index.php. “Tindak Tegas Penipu Laporan Keuangan Bakrie”. Accessed on date January 27, 2011.

Imtikhani, L., & Sukirman, S. (2021). Determinan Fraudulent Financial Statement Melalui Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 19(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v19i1.3654

Karjono, F. A. H. dan A. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Financial Stability, Ineffective Monitoring Dan Rationalization Terhadap Integritas Laporan Keuangan Dalam Perspektif Fraud Trianglepada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdapat Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2012-2016. ESENSI: Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 22(2), 162–188. https://ibn.e-journal.id/index.php/ESENSI/article/view/166/136

Kasmir. (2019). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (1st ed.). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Khafid, M. 2015. Factors Affecting Earnings Persistence(Institutional Ownership as a Moderating Variable). Proceeding, Airlangga Accounting International Conference.

Khamainy, A. H., Amalia, M. M., Cakranegara, P. A., & Indrawati, A. (2022). Financial Statement Fraud: The Predictive Relevance of Fraud Hexagon Theory. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 5(1), 110–133. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v5i1.249

Kirana, M., Toni, N., Afiezan, A., & Simorangkir, E. N. (2023). Apakah Teori Kecurangan Hexagon Efektif Mencegah Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan BUMN? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2023.14.1.06

Maretha, N., & Purwaningsih, A. (2013). Pengaruh Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan, dengan Komposisi Aset dan Ukuran Perusahaan sebagai Variabel Kontrol. Modus, 25(2), 2013.

Meckling, M. C. J. and W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718812602

Mohamad Zulman Hakim, Rachmania, D., Siregar, I. G., Novitasari, A. R., Afifah, A. M., & Yolanda, P. (2023). The Effect of Fraud Hexagon on Financial Statement Fraud (Empirical Study of Infrastructur Sector Companies in 2020-2022). International Journal of Accounting, Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 1(Oktober), 558–57. https://ijamesc.com/index.php/go/article/view/81/50

Mukaromah, I., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2021). Fraud Hexagon Theory dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan pada Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015-2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 14(1), 61–72. http://journal.stekom.ac.id/index.php/kompak

Nurhakim, A. L., & Harto, P. (2023). Kecurangan, BUMN Fraud Pentagon: Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(2), 311. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i02.p03

Octaviana, N. (2022). Analisis Elemen-Elemen Fraud Hexagon Theory Sebagai Determinan Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v11i2.895

Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 11/25/PBI/2009 Tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko bagi Bank Umum.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor: 33/POJK/2014 Tentang Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris Emiten atau Perusahaan Publik.

Rizkiawan, M. (2021). Analisis Fraud Hexagon dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Atas Adanya Kecurangan dalam Laporan Keuangan. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(2), 269–282.

Sagala, S. G., & Siagian, V. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Model Terhadap Fraudulent Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Makanan dan Minuman yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2016-2019. Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(November), 245–259. http://114.7.153.31/index.php/jam/article/view/3956

Sari, M. P., Mahardika, E., Suryandari, D., & Raharja, S. (2022). The audit committee as moderating the effect of hexagon’s fraud on fraudulent financial statements in mining companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2150118. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2150118

Sari, S., & Khoiriah, ati. (2021). Hexagon Fraud Detection of Regional Government Financial Statement as A Fraud Prevention on The Pandemic Crisis Era. Wacana Journal of Social and Humanity Studies, 24(2), 90–97.

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., Wright, C. J., & Chasteen Chair, L. G. (2008). Detecting And Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness Of The Fraud Traingle And SAS No. 99. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494Electroniccopyavailableat:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494

Sudrajat, S., Suryadnyana, N. A., & Supriadi, T. (2023). Fraud Hexagon: Detection of Fraud of Financial Report in State-owned Enterprises in Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 9(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v9i1.1358

Sumbari, S., Kamaliah, K., & Fitrios, R. (2023). Analisis Model Fraud Hexagon Dalam Mendeteksi Potensi Kecurangan Pada Laporan Keuangan Analysis of Fraud Hexagon To Detect Fraud on Financial Statement. 4(1), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.31258/current.4.1.179-196

Tjahjani, F., Rizky, B. M., Pudjiastuti, W., & ... (2022). Fraud Pentagon Theory: Indication Toward Fraudulent Financial Reporting on Non-Banking Sector. International Journal of …, 2022(3), 1349–1360. https://www.jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/IJEBAR/article/view/6026%0Ahttps://www.jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/IJEBAR/article/download/6026/2649

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128

Wahyudin, A. 2012. Pengaruh Ownership Structure terhadap Debt Policy dengan Prinsip-Prinsip Corporate Governance sebagai Variabel Intervening. Disertasi (Tidak Dipublikasikan). Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Ekonomi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro.

Most read articles by the same author(s)