Does Fraud Pentagon cause financial report manipulation?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The most visible measure of a company's health is its financial reports. This critical function may motivate management to engage in fraudulent activities to impress that the company is constantly in good shape and profitable. As a result, the information is distorted and potentially jeopardizes investment decisions. Therefore, it is crucial to find a way to detect that deviant behavior. This research aims to fulfill this requirement. Using the period of 2017-2019 as the sample timeframe, the authors pay attention to the IDX30 version companies listed on the IDX. Financial statement fraud, financial stability, financial targets, industry type, poor supervision, auditor turnover, change of directors, and the frequency of appearance of CEO images are the variables under investigation. The secondary data from 48 units of analysis were analyzed using logistic regression. Financial stability and industry structure have a significant effect on financial statement fraud. Other variables under investigation have little effect.
Downloads
Article Details
References
AICPA. (2002). Pertimbangan fraud dalam audit laporan keuangan. Pernyataan Standar Audit No.99. AICPA.
AICPA. (2019). Pertimbangan fraud dalam laporan keuangan. Panduan Audit dan Akuntansi – Kontraktor Konstruksi,193–206.
Annisya, M., Lindrianasari, & Yuztitya Asmaranti. (2016). Pendeteksian kecurang laporan Keuangan menggunakan Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi 23(1), 72-89. Retrieved from https://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fe3/article/view/4307.
Apriliana, S. & Agustina, L. (2017). Analisis penentu pelaporan keuangan fraudulent melalui pendekatan Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(2):154–65. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jda/article/view/4036.
Arens, A.A. (2014). Jasa Audit dan Assurance: Suatu Pendekatan Terintegrasi [Translated by Wibowo, H., Perti, T., & Saat, S]. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Arens, A.A., Elder, R.J. & Mark, B. (2016). Jasa Audit dan Assurance: Suatu Pendekatan Terintegrasi [Translated by Wibowo, H]. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A.M.A, & Daat, S.C. 2018. Pengujian teori Fraud Pentagon terhadap pelaporan keuangan penipuan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Daerah, 13(1):114–34. Retrieved from https://fe.ummetro.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/JA/article/view/578/0
Bayagub, A., Wafirotin, K.Z., & Mustoffa, A.F. (2019). Analisis elemen-elemen Fraud Pentagon sebagai determinan fraudulent financial reporting (Studi pada perusahaan property dan real estate yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2014-2016). ISOQUANT: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 2(2):1–11.
Beneish, M.D. 1999. Deteksi Manipulasi Laba. Jurnal Analis Keuangan, 55(5):24– 36.
Beneish, M.D., Lee, C.M.C. & Nichols, D.C. (2013). Manipulasi laba dan pengembalian yang diharapkan. Jurnal Analis Keuangan, 69(2):57–82.
Horwath, C. (2012). Pikiran di balik kejahatan penipu: Elemen perilaku dan lingkungan utama. Crowe Horwath LLP, 1–62.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. 1995. Teori pemangku kepentingan korporasi: Konsep, bukti, dan implikasinya. Review Akademi Manajemen, 20(1):65–91.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Review Akademi Manajemen 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
Freeman, Jeffrey, Andrew, Bidhan, dan Simone. 1984. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press
Ghozali, Imam. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate IBM SPSS 23. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Ghozali, I., Pamungkas, I.D, Achmad, T., Khaddafi, M., & Hidayah, R. (2018). Mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan dalam mencegah penipuan akuntansi: Studi model penipuan pentagon. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan, 8(2): 549–60.
Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. (2016). Kerangka Konseptual Pelaporan Keuangan. Ikatan Akuntasi Indonesia.
Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economy, 3(4):305–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Loebbecke, J.K., Eining, M.M. & Willingham, J.J. (1989). "Auditors' experience with irregularities: frequency, nature, and detectability". Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9 (Fall), 1-28.
Yusof, M., & Khairusany. (2016). “Pelaporan Keuangan Penipuan: Penerapan Model Penipuan pada Perusahaan Publik Malaysia.”
Pamungkas, P. A. (2018). Analisis faktor risiko kecurangan teori Fraud Pentagon dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud (Studi empiris pada perusahaan yang terdaftar dalam Jakarta Islamic Index di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2013-2016) [Student paper]. Universitas Islam Nusantara.
Pasaribu, R. B. F., & Kharisma, A. (2018). Fraud laporan keuangan dalam perspektif Fraud Triangle.” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 14(1), 53–65.
Priantara, D. (2013). Audit & Investigasi Penipuan. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Puspita, M. Y., & Yasa, G.W. (2018). Fraud Pentagon analysis in detecting fraudulent financial reporting (Studi pada pasar modal Indonesia). Jurnal Sains Internasional: Riset Dasar dan Terapan, 42(5), 93–109.
Putriasih, K., Herawati, N.T., & Wahyuni, M.A. (2016). Analisis Fraud Diamond dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud: Studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) tahun 2013-2015. JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha 6(3).
http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jimat.v6i3.8808
Setiawati, E. &, & Baningrum, M. (2018). Deteksi fraudulent financial reporting menggunakan analisis Fraud Pentagon: Studi kasus pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2014-2016. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(2), 91–106.
Skousen, C.J., Smith, K.R., & Wright, C.J. (2008). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99. Corporate Finance: Governance.
Wolfe, D.T. & Hermanson, D.R. (2004. Wolfe, D.T., & Hermanson, D.R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. Semantic Scholar.