Why environmental consciousness does not affect intention to buy?

Main Article Content

Benita Benyamin
Dergibson Siagian

Abstract

Environmental consciousness arises when there is an understanding of the need for a balance between life and nature. This study aims to investigate whether such consciousness affects purchasing behavior of environmental-friendly claimed products directly or through their interaction with a price. To answer this question, the authors recruited 100 consumers as respondents who met the authors' predetermined requirements. The data analyzed using structural equation modeling reveals that environmental consciousness does not affect purchase intention, but the price does. It is also found to have no interaction with the price in influencing behavioral intention. This result leaves a question that further researchers can answer. Study in different product categories is encouraged.


Original Article | Turnitin

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Benyamin, B., & Siagian, D. (2021). Why environmental consciousness does not affect intention to buy? . Jurnal Ekonomi Perusahaan, 28(2), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.46806/jep.v28i2.832
Section
Research Articles
Author Biography

Dergibson Siagian, Management Department, Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Dergibson Siagian holds a bachelor's degree in statistics from the Bogor Agricultural Institute in 1990. He obtained a master's in management from STIE IBII (now Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Indonesia) in 1996. He is currently active as a lecturer in subjects related to Statistics. In addition, he is actively involved as a consultant in the statistical data processing. The popular book he wrote is Metoda Statistika Bisnis (Business Statistical Methods).

References

Barbarossa, C. & Pastore, A. (2015). Why environmentally conscious consumers do not purchase green products: A cognitive mapping approach. Qualitative Market Research, 18(2), 188-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2012-0030

Becker, W., & Smith, R.J. (2014). Responsibility, sustainability, and human Resource Practices. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2120195

Borsma, A. (1982). Robustness of LISREL against small in the factor analysis model. In Hau, K.T., & Marsh, H.W [Eds.]. (2004). The use of items parcels in structural equation modeling: Non-normal data and small sample size. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 57, 327-351.

Butler, A. (2018, Nov. 21). Do customers really care about your environmental impact? Forbes [Business Website]. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesnycouncil/2018/11/21/do-customers-really-care-about-your-environmental-impact/?sh=7b72acd2240d

Hair, I., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2016). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc.

Krosofsky, A. (2021, Aug. 21). The Cost of Environmentalism: Why Sustainable Products Are More Expensive. Greenmatter [Environmental-Oriented News Website]. https://www.greenmatters.com/p/are-sustainable-products-more-expensive

Schiffman, L. G., & Wisenblit, J. (2015). Consumer Behavior (Global Edition). Pearson Education Limited.

Solomon, M. R. (2018). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being (12th ed.). Pearson.

Wang, J., Pham, T. L., & Dang, V. T. (2020). Environmental Consciousness and Organic Food Purchase Intention: A Moderated Mediation Model of Perceived Food Quality and Price Sensitivity. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(3), 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030850