Evaluating the impact of hexagon fraud on potential financial statement fraud with audit quality as a moderator
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Agency theory states that fraudulent financial reporting involves deliberate actions that misrepresent financial data, often driven by conflicting interests between agents and principals. On the other hand, the GONE theory attributes fraud to greed, opportunity, needs, and exposure. This study investigates the influence of the fraud hexagon on the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting, with audit quality as a moderating factor. Therefore, the authors purposively selected 40 industrial sector companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2020 to 2022, ending with 120 observations as the sample. Data analysis with pooling tests and MRA tests reveals that total asset accrual and holding multiple positions contribute to the potential for fraudulent financial reporting. However, financial targets, CEO education, engagement in government projects, and industry nature exhibit no significant impact. Additionally, the moderating effect of audit quality fails to mitigate the positive influence of financial targets and industry nature on fraudulent financial reporting potential. Future research can employ logistic regression and incorporate additional independent variables.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
ACFE Global. (2020). Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse: 2020 Global Fraud Study. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc., 1–88. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2020/
Adhitama, F., Khamisah, N., Farhan, M., & Setiawan, R. (2023). Pengaruh hexagon fraud dan audit tenure terhadap fraudulent financial reporting. Reviu Akuntansi dan Bisnis Indonesia, 7(2), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.18196/rabin.v7i2.18155
Amar, T., & Iskandar, D. (2023). Analisis pengaruh fraud hexagon terhadap fraudulent financial statement (Studi Empiris pada perusahaan sektor basic material yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2018 – 2021). Jurnal Penelitian Akuntansi, 4(1), 29–41. https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/JPA/article/view/6662/0
Annisa, R. A., & Ghozali, I. (2020). Pendeteksian kecurangan laporan keuangan menggunakan analisis beneish m-score pada perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2017-2018. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 9(3), 1–12. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/29120
Ardiyani, S., & Utaminingsih, N. S. (2015). Analisis determinan financial statement melalui pendekatan Fraud Triangle. Accounting Analysis Journal, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v4i1.7761
Aviantara, R. (2021). The association between fraud hexagon and government’s fraudulent financial report. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 6(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v6i1.192
Beneish, M. D. (1999). The Detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 55(No. 5), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296
Bologna, J. (1993). Handbook on Corporate Fraud: Prevention, Detection, and Investigation. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Bowerman, B. L. (2017). Business Statistics and Analytics in Practice (9th Edition). McGraw - Hill International Edition.
Decgow, P. ., Larson, C. ., & R.G, S. (2007). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28, 17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x
Fajri, M. A. N., Febrianti, G. B., & Rahmayani, S. (2023). Pengaruh fraud hexagon terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan pada perusahaan properti dan real estate yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2018-2021. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(2), 767–780. https://doi.org/10.56799/jim.v2i2.1337
Fouziah, S. N., Suratno, & Djaddang, S. (2022). Relevansi Teori Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Statement Pada Perusahaan Sektor Perbankan. Substansi: Sumber Artikel Akuntansi, Auditing, dan Keuangan Vokasi, 6(1), 59–77. https://jurnal.pknstan.ac.id/index.php/SUBS/article/view/1525
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 (9th Edition). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hartadi, B. (2022). Pengaruh fraud hexagon terhadap fraudulent financial statements pada perusahaan badan usaha milik negara indonesia yang terdaftar di BEI pada Tahun 2018-2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 14883–14896.
Himawan, A. F. (2022). Pengaruh penerapan good corporate governance, profitabilitas, dan leverage terhadap earning manipulation dengan moderasi kualitas audit. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 11(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.34308/eqien.v11i03.1170
Iqbal, M., & Murtanto. (2016). Analisa pengaruh faktor-faktor fraud triangle terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan pada perusahaan propertydan real estate yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan 2016, 1–20. https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/173150/analisa-pengaruh-faktor-faktor-fraud-triangle-terhadap-kecurangan-laporan-keuang
Jannah, V. M., Andreas, & Rasuli, M. (2021). Pendekatan vousinas fraud hexagon model dalam mendeteksi kecurangan pelaporan keuangan. Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21632/saki.4.1.1-16
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). The theory of the firm: Manajerial behaviour, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economic, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kristiana, D. R., & Hatta, A. J. (2022). Portrait of the polemic of fraud in conventional and sharia insurance company. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(6), 1603–1617. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2022.v32.i06.p16
Mardeliani, S., Sudrajat, & Alvia, L. (2022). Analisis kecurangan laporan keuangan menurut hexagon fraud model pada perusahaan bumn tahun 2016-2020. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, (3(7), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v3i7.458
Octaviana, N. (2022). Analisis elemen-elemen fraud hexagon theory sebagai determinan fraudulent financial reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v11i2.895
Pratiwi, A. S., Fanny, N., & Satyabrata, P. (2022). Pengaruh fraud pentagon dan kepemilikan institusional dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14050
Pratiya, M. A. M., Susetyo, B., & Mubarok, A. (2018). Pengaruh stabilitas keuangan, target keuangan tingkat kinerja, rasio perputaran aset, keahlian keuangan komite audit, dan profitabilitas terhadap fraudulent financial statement. Jurnal Permana, 10(1), 116–131.
Preicilia, C., Wahyudi, I., & Preicilia, A. (2022). Analisa kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan perspektif teori fraud hexagon. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 5(3). http://journal.ikopin.ac.id/index.php/fairvalue/article/view/2476
Primastiwi, A., & Saeful. (2020). Kualitas audit sebagai pemoderasi pengaruh fraud triangle terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 11(2), 107–122. https://e-journal.janabadra.ac.id/index.php/jurnalefektif/article/view/1329
Putri, A. C., & Suhartono, S. (2023). Kemampuan kualitas audit memoderasi pengaruh fraud hexagon terhadap fraudulent financial statements. Jurnal Bina Akuntansi, 10(2), 732–757. https://wiyatamandala.e-journal.id/JBA/article/view/435/265
Rohmah, S., Setiawati, E., Chairuddin, S., & Aditama, R. (2023). Pengaruh akuntansi forensik, whistleblowing system dan audit investigasi dalam pengungkapan fraud (Studi kasus pada Inspektorat Daerah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur dan Inspektorat Daerah Kota Samarinda). Nusantara Innovation Journal, 2(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.32528/nij.v2i2.24
Sagala, S. G., & Siagian, V. (2021). Pengaruh fraud hexagon model terhadap fraudulent laporan keuangan pada perusahaan sub sektor makanan dan minuman yang terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2016-2019. Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v13i2.3956
Sari, S. P., & Nugroho, N. K. (2020). Financial Statements Fraud dengan Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model: Tinjauan pada Perusahaan Terbuka di Indonesia. Islamic Economics and Finance, 409–430. http://www.seminar.uad.ac.id/index.php/ihtifaz/article/view/3641
SAS No. 99. (2003). Fraud Detection in a GAAS Audit: SAS No. 99 Implementation Guide.
Scott, W. R. (2015). Financial Accounting Theory. Seventh Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall
Siddiq, F. R., & Suseno, A. E. (2019). Fraud Pentagon theory dalam financial statement fraud pada perusahaan terdaftar di Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) periode 2014-2017 (Perspektif F-Score model). Jurnal Nusantara, 4(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.29407/nusamba.v4i2.13800
Sihombing, T., & Panggulu, G. E. (2022). Fraud Hexagon Theory and Fraudulent Financial Statement in it Industry in ASEAN. Jurnal Reviiu Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(3), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i3.23334
Siregar, M. (2019). Pengaruh Crowe’s Fraud Pentagon model terhadap kecurangan pelaporan keuangan dengan auditor switching sebagai variabel moderasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pakar, 53(9), 1689–1699. http://www.trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/pakar/article/view/6915.
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2008). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of The Fraud Traingle and SAS No. 99. 99. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1295494
Suwarsa, T., & Hasibuan, A. R. (2021). Pengaruh pajak restoran dan pajak hotel terhadap pendapatan asli daerah kota Padangsidempuan periode 2018-2020. Jurnal Akuntansi, 14(2), 71–85.
Tarjo, Anggono, A., & Sakti, E. (2021). Detecting indications of financial statement fraud: A Hexagon Fraud Theory approach. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v13n1.p119-131
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128